Amped News - Console and PC News, Reviews, Previews and moreAmped eSports - Competitive GamingAmped Mods - PC Game Modification and MappingBetter servers. More games. Unmatched Control.
Register for a free accountLost your password?
HOME
PC
PS3
XBOX360
Wii
HANDHELD
Amadeo Plaza
Adverjournalism: The Role of Ad Dollars In Journalism
The jump from being a “strong title” to being “disappointing across the board,” is questionable at best. But this is the reality of it, and people hold these sites in such high regard. What they need to realize is that when a publication is put on such a lofty pedestal, advertisers are attracted to them like moths to a flame. And at that point, the thousands of dollars that are thrown around become increasingly difficult to manage, and that’s when mishaps such as Jeff’s take place.

Supposedly, the Kane & Lynch debacle was settled weeks ago, but it’s very possible that Eidos recently decided to pull future ad campaigns, which definitely could have been the straw that broke the camel’s back for the bigwigs at CNET. Like it or not, the “professional” sites, whose opinions seemingly matter most, battle with the balance of journalistic integrity and advertising relationships day-in and day-out. And it should come as no surprise that it’s the “community” sites that are much more resistant to these influences because advertisers aren’t flocking to them as frequently.

Eidos Interactive is one of the more profitable publishers in the industry, and it's their Kane & Lynch ad campaign on GameSpot that sparked this whole controversy.
I think a reason this situation has created such a huge ripple throughout the industry is because it’s the first time that it has happened to a publication such as GameSpot, as far as we know. Like I said before, this kind of thing happens all the time. In fact, years ago, a game publisher attempted to bribe one of our writers to bump up a score we gave out. We of course turned them down. But open your eyes people; this is the state of affairs. Publications need advertising to pay salaries. And if you look outside of the world of gaming, you will see this is not an isolated event; it happens in more mainstream forms of journalism, and I might add that this could be even seen as a sign of growth for our industry.

I remember a story from an old college professor of mine who works for Time Inc.: Time magazine published an article that slightly badmouthed one of IBM’s computers, which resulted in the computer giant in pulling its advertising for the following three years. Whether or not the writer was fired, I don’t know. I don’t believe so, but I can’t be sure. The bottom line is that the industry has gotten to the point where situations like this even exist. We’re no longer in a state of being so tightly knit together that everyone is rubbing elbows, and honestly that was bound to happen if the industry was going to grow to a respectable enough size where it can contend with the likes of its entertainment brethren.

As the industry grows, more money is circulated, and money begets corruption. It’s a fact of life and it’s a fact of capitalism; this is America after all. Jeff Gerstmann was merely the first high ranking casualty, but the man isn’t dead; he’s an exceptional writer and I’m sure we’ll all see him back in action soon enough.

We’re not parading what happened to Jeff as an acceptable event. The Boston Massacre wasn’t an acceptable event. But it was the first shot that sparked a revolution; and perhaps that is what we’re on the brink of: a journalistic revolution; and oddly enough, it may be the blogs and “community” sites, whose opinions never carried as much weight, who lead this coup d’etat.

I’m not trying to say that the tables will turn and “community” sites will swap spots with Gamespot and IGN; realistically speaking, that will never happen. But it’s very possible that the “community” sites will be very much like the villagers with torches and pitchforks who act as the catalyst for change. Gamespot and IGN will surely remain on top, despite protest and petition, but the journalistic practices of sites such as Gamer 2.0 may become more closely scrutinized in the coming years.

I send my regards out to Jeff and offer him a high ranking unpaid position on the East Coast should he be looking for a change of scenery. If not, we look forward to hearing from him soon elsewhere.
Previous Page
Page Listing: 1 | 2
Next Page
12/1/07 - 5:08 PM
Joined:
1/24/05
I didn't put this in my article, but honestly all CNET seems to have done was turn Jeff into a martyr.
12/1/07 - 6:23 PM
Joined:
1/8/07
One would think it's somewhat of a good thing for the gaming industry to be getting bigger the way it has. Only, it's stuff like this that shows the bigger you get, the shadier it can get.
12/1/07 - 7:08 PM
Joined:
1/24/05
Quote:
Originally posted by Alex Q.
One would think it's somewhat of a good thing for the gaming industry to be getting bigger the way it has. Only, it's stuff like this that shows the bigger you get, the shadier it can get.
Look at the music industry...need I say more?
12/1/07 - 7:08 PM
Joined:
11/2/05
Quote:
Originally posted by Amadeo P.
I didn't put this in my article, but honestly all CNET seems to have done was turn Jeff into a martyr.
Agreed. Any subtlety that they hoped to have in this situation has severely backfired.
12/1/07 - 8:07 PM
Joined:
1/8/07
Quote:
Originally posted by Amadeo P.
Look at the music industry...need I say more?
Well, you could lol. I watched some documentary on rock and roll and one of the big things was the payola scandals in the 50s and so. I'll go out on a limb and say the music industry has the worst showing of that stuff.
12/2/07 - 12:54 AM
Joined:
5/13/05
A fine article.


The man is not dead, people.
12/2/07 - 1:03 AM
Joined:
12/2/07
You've got it right on the mark. This is a problem in pretty much all industries, and with any publication where there is any form of financial relationship no matter how firewalled people are from the advert teams. This has always been an issue in the gaming media, combined with a complete lack of journalistic integrity by an ever eager legion of kids looking for gamer swag and the chance to play games before they hit the street. As I've mentioned myself elsewhere... previews, story exclusives/leads and early access for reviews are the lifeblood of every magazine. Piss off a publisher and you risk loosing all of that... then you're nothing more than 3 months behind everyone else on the news (if your in print) that effects your reader base, which in turn effects advertising not just from publishers, but across the board.
There is no simple fix to this problem except solidarity and enforced quality control within the press ACROSS THE BOARD.
12/2/07 - 2:16 AM
Joined:
12/2/07
Nice article, it's interesting how growth in the gaming industry is a plus, but at the same time it has the potential to breed corruption, which is a negative.
12/2/07 - 2:21 AM
Joined:
7/12/05
Any sort of review print will have this problem. Car reviewing magazines, consumer product reviewing, and video game reviewing. Because their consumer base is reading these publications, advertisers wish to place ads and get some screen time. However, their giving of money will directly or indirectly affect the reviews in the magazine. Thus, the reviews would be more reliable had no advertising been in the publication, but if there was no advertising, there'd be no publication.

This issue is a catch-22 here and means something's gotta change. Either publications earn all their money on subscriptions, or we start favoring Yahtee Croshaw (escapistmagazine.com) styled reviews which are unquantifiable.
12/2/07 - 3:27 AM
Joined:
1/24/05
Quote:
Originally posted by Andrew G.
Any sort of review print will have this problem. Car reviewing magazines, consumer product reviewing, and video game reviewing. Because their consumer base is reading these publications, advertisers wish to place ads and get some screen time. However, their giving of money will directly or indirectly affect the reviews in the magazine. Thus, the reviews would be more reliable had no advertising been in the publication, but if there was no advertising, there'd be no publication.

This issue is a catch-22 here and means something's gotta change. Either publications earn all their money on subscriptions, or we start favoring Yahtee Croshaw (escapistmagazine.com) styled reviews which are unquantifiable.
Well put Andrew. It is a problem, and honestly, there's no easy solution to the problem. And I have to tip my hat to bcRIPster. You hit the nail on the head with some of those statements, and I wanted to tackle some of these issues in that article I wanted to write, but got stonewalled by PR reps. Gaming journalism is entirely too spoon-fed. It really is, and honestly, it pisses me off to no hell because although everyone in the industry is spoon-fed, regardless of the publication size, the bigger ones are served caviar while others are given the scales.
12/2/07 - 4:22 AM
Joined:
12/2/07
I'll be honest, it was this crap that caused us to do our own magazine in 92' (Game Zero), and we did everything we could to keep publisher advertising out. In the end it was a combination of challenges at generating revenue and outside pressures on many in the staff with college demands that were the chief reasons that we finally started to wind the magazine down at the end of 96'. Believe me though, there isn't a day that goes by where I don't think about giving it another run. Unfortunately I just don't have the same kind of time I used to...
12/2/07 - 5:02 AM
Joined:
1/24/05
Quote:
Originally posted by bcRIPster
I'll be honest, it was this crap that caused us to do our own magazine in 92' (Game Zero), and we did everything we could to keep publisher advertising out. In the end it was a combination of challenges at generating revenue and outside pressures on many in the staff with college demands that were the chief reasons that we finally started to wind the magazine down at the end of 96'. Believe me though, there isn't a day that goes by where I don't think about giving it another run. Unfortunately I just don't have the same kind of time I used to...
Yeah, I totally understand what you mean. Sometimes we all go through those rough spots. To be honest, there was a time where I stepped down Editor-In-Chief, but then came back shortly afterwards as Publisher. Go figure. lol. You have to pick and choose your business ventures I suppose. Sometimes they work out, sometimes they don't; but none of them ever come easy.
12/2/07 - 5:40 AM
Joined:
12/2/07
Great article. It's weird because as our traffic increases I'm looking to start filling ad spots. I can't believe the readership of some of the big sites like 1up and gamespot. It makes me wonder why the publishers even bother sending us stuff to review. I'm hoping that I can score some ad sales but damn, this article shed some light and has me wondering if I should even bother. One of our editors wrote and article about journalistic integrity the other day. I'm assuming a lot of these articles will start popping up. Give it a read at The Bitbag
12/2/07 - 6:24 AM
Joined:
12/2/07
Yes indeed. Best of luck and keep up the good fight =D Someone's gotta do it.
12/2/07 - 10:52 AM
Joined:
5/16/05
Good article, its tragic how things have changed drastically over this whole situation.
12/2/07 - 12:55 PM
Joined:
1/8/07
That was a good read at The Bitbag link. I added the site to my bookmarks.
12/2/07 - 11:42 PM
Joined:
12/2/07
Congrats, you guys have been slashdot'd!

http://games.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=07/12/02/0132247&from=rss

Anyways, all gamespot has done is try to cover this thing up with disabling user reviews, deleting blog entries, and given no official word as it happened. Instead they are letting the community take charge of this one, and lucky for me, its not going their way. I hope CNET goes to hell after this crap!
12/3/07 - 12:51 AM
Joined:
12/3/07
This was an amazingly well written and informative article.
12/3/07 - 3:24 PM
Joined:
1/24/05
Quote:
Originally posted by Kori911
This was an amazingly well written and informative article.
Thank you :)

Oh, and WickedCobra, I totally agree with you in saying that the story has really taken on a life of its own. Management at CNET should have done a better job of handling the story instead of waiting so long to release an official statement that was at least informative. As a result, the rumors and speculation that came out of this whole fiasco is hurting them badly. It could have been handled better.
12/3/07 - 10:57 PM
Joined:
12/2/07
Well written. This is a great summary of what is going on with the industry.
2/16/08 - 5:03 AM
Joined:
2/11/08
now a day everyone knows the publication secrets. well written article. really enjoyed reading it
You must be logged in to post a comment.

Fatal error: Call to private method GameFlex::session_close() from context '' in Unknown on line 0